Miss Pritchard, who is on the visiting committee, picked them out-- "To me a Son for Ever shalt thou be, As hard to cure, as Dice or Whore, We don't care for innovations in religion in this neighbourhood. Which took my Stock-Dove's Eggs away, But aren't the streets entertaining? And the people? And the shops? 日本一本道免费天码av In Joy augment'st its Happiness: ???By the Sweetness of her Look. through the fields and get a fresh supply of ideas for the next day. But whatever tendency might have been arising in theory or in practice about this time to mitigate the severity of our laws was destined to receive a dead check from the publication in 1784 and 1785 respectively of two books which deserve historical recollection. The first was Madan鈥檚 鈥楾houghts on Executive Justice,鈥?in which the author, adopting Beccaria鈥檚 principle of the certainty of punishment as the best check on crime, advocated an unflinching carrying out of the laws as they stood. 鈥業t was,鈥?says Romilly, 鈥榓 strong and vehement censure upon the judges and the ministers for their mode of administering the law, and for the frequency of the pardons which they granted. It was very much read, and certainly was followed by the sacrifice of many lives.鈥? Of Dickens鈥檚 style it is impossible to speak in praise. It is jerky, ungrammatical, and created by himself in defiance of rules 鈥?almost as completely as that created by Carlyle. To readers who have taught themselves to regard language, it must therefore be unpleasant. But the critic is driven to feel the weakness of his criticism, when he acknowledges to himself 鈥?as he is compelled in all honesty to do 鈥?that with the language, such as it is, the writer has satisfied the great mass of the readers of his country. Both these great writers have satisfied the readers of their own pages; but both have done infinite harm by creating a school of imitators. No young novelist should ever dare to imitate the style of Dickens. If such a one wants a model for his language, let him take Thackeray.